Friday, June 10, 2011

Faith and Fiction Round Table: A Canticle For Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller, Jr.


The Faith and Fiction Round Table recently read and discussed A Canticle for Liebowitz by Walter M. Miller, Jr.

The book is a look, in three novellas, at a post-apocalyptic world through the ages and how it rebuilds itself.

One little part that stuck out to me occurs in the first novella. Brother Francis has spent many many years making an illuminated copy of a blueprint he found in his early years. He was only allowed to work on it in his free time. He's making a trip to New Rome for the canonization of Isaac Edward Liebowitz. He's robbed along the way and the robbers mistakenly take his illuminated copy of the blueprint to be the item of value leaving him crushed, but still in possession of the original.

When he recounts this story to the pope, the pope comforts him by telling him he did not waste his life on the illuminated copy only to have it stolen, but rather it served its purpose by protecting the original document.

I was struck by this story for a couple of reasons, first because I do often think this is way things work. We often labor towards one end and believe in one outcome for that end, only to be surprised that life takes a different turn. There's often a purpose to things that ends up being different than what we imagined and in some cases far less glorious than we hoped for.

Also, I thought it was interesting because the robbers only recognized the value of the gold on the illuminated copy and didn't understand that the original had worth that extended beyond the material. This sort of vision is echoed a bit later when Francis is in New Rome

The wink, or blink seemed to bring the room into clearer focus for the monk. For the first time, he noticed a moth-hole in the Pope's cassock. The cassock itself was almost threadbare. The carpet in the audience room was worn through in spots. Plaster had fallen from the ceiling in several places. But dignity had overshadowed poverty. Only for a moment after the wink did Brother Francis notice hints of poverty at all. The distraction was transient.


(emphasis mine) I'm not exactly sure why I liked this passage except that the idea of what has value and worth is always of tremendous interest to me. There is worldly worth and then there are other kinds of worth--which is most important? One can perhaps keep you fed, maybe safe, another can enlighten your mind and nourish your soul. I feel like Canticle for Liebowitz engages this idea in a variety of ways throughout the book. The monks are often at odds with the world around them, in the preservation and use of knowledge, later in the question of the sanctity of life. It's a question that will always be there, because it's a tension that will always exist.

Other participants in the Faith and Fiction Round Table:
Ignorant Historian
Wordlily
Book Addiction
3Rs Blog
Books and Movies
Book Hooked Blog
Semicolon

Amy

Comments (12)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I had to read this book when I was senior for AP English and i absolutely loved it. it was not a book that I would have picked up otherwise so i'm really glad that my teacher had us read it. it's one of the few books from school that really made a lasting image of me. I wish i had all the papers with me that we analyzed it on (they are at my parents) but one of the discussions we had involved how Rachel was like the Second Coming of Christ. I can't remember the rest of the discussion off the top of my head but I always found that argument to be interesting and wonder if anyone else in the table came up with that?
2 replies · active 723 weeks ago
Someone did mention it but we didn't understand how the conclusion was drawn. Can you enlighten us?
Next time I go visit my parents, I'll try to find my notebook.
I agree, Amy. The parts you mentioned stuck out to me, too. (I really loved the first novella!) They also give a different perspective on the concept of time, I think; he spent how many years on that illumination? And so many of the monks had projects that, although they spent their whole lives on them, wouldn't be accomplished in a single lifetime. That long view is a good one for us to glimpse sometimes, because we're so used to time being *now,* and hardly even existing beyond our own scope. (At least I fall into that, sometimes.)
1 reply · active 723 weeks ago
So true about time and taking the long view. I suck at it. :)
Hi Amy- I posted my thoughts up today as well even though it was a DNF for me..:(

I loved your thoughts and how you see things in literary context.
1 reply · active 723 weeks ago
Hi Tina, I'll add your link, sorry about that!
That first section was definitely my favorite. I was amazed at the long-suffering of the monks - that he would work on that manuscript for years and years, never feeling like his effort wasn't worth it, because he was doing it as an act of worship. I think there is a lot we can take from that.
1 reply · active 723 weeks ago
The first was my favorite as well, though I also enjoyed the second.
I think I liked the second novella best (I'm probably in the minority), but Brother Francis was probably the character who was easiest to connect with in the entire book, and I appreciated that his work wasn't portrayed as ultimately futile.
I loved all three sections, although it's been a few years now and I can't remember them all that well. I remember just being bowled over by the writing, which really happens to me very rarely. I particularly loved the respect for books that ran all through the three novellas. Yay. Scholarship. I'm in favor.
Your review reminds me, Amy, Ias a longtime fan of Michael Moorcock's work--he who always recommends this writer--I've been meaning to get to these books. Guess it's time to go dig them out. :) Thanks for the nudge.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment! I appreciate hearing your thoughts.